AP English Language & Composition · College Board müfredatı

AP English Language

Retorik analiz, sentez ve argüman yazımı; okuma ve yazma soruları.

3 ESSAY
Synthesis · Rhetorical · Argument
TAM DİJİTAL
Bluebook'ta klavyeyle
12 MAYIS
2027 sınav günü

AP English Language Sınav Yapısı

SECTION I • MULTIPLE CHOICE

45 MCQ • 1 saat • Puanın %45'i

  • Reading:23–25 soru — kurgu dışı pasajlarda retorik durum, iddia–kanıt, akıl yürütme ve üslup
  • Writing:20–22 soru — öğrenci taslağını revize etme (tez, kanıt, geçiş, izleyici, cümle sırası)
SECTION II • FREE RESPONSE

3 FRQ (açık uçlu soru) • 2 saat 15 dk • Puanın %55'i

  • Sorular:Synthesis, Rhetorical Analysis, Argument (süreye önerilen 15 dk okuma dahildir)
  • Rubrik:Her essay 6 puan: Thesis 0–1, Evidence & Commentary 0–4, Sophistication 0–1

Bölüm II: 3 Büyük Makale Türü ve 6 Puan Rubriği

SORU 1 • SENTEZ MAKALESİ

Synthesis Essay

Sana verilen 6-7 kaynaktan (grafik, istatistik, köşe yazısı, editoryal) kanıt seçerek savunulabilir bir tez üretmek ve kaynakları kendi akıl yürütmene hizmet ettirmek.

  • Kural: Evidence & Commentary'de 2+ puan için en az 3 kaynaktan kanıt; kaynaklar (Source A, Source B…) belirtilmeli
  • Tez Yapısı: "Although X, because Y, therefore Z."
SORU 2 • RETORİK ANALİZ

Rhetorical Analysis

Tarihi veya modern bir konuşma/metnin yazarının hedef kitlesini ikna etmek için hangi retorik seçimleri (diksiyon, ton, tezat, metafor) yaptığını analiz etmek.

  • Metot: SPACE-CAT veya SOAPS Analizi
  • Odak: Yazar NE söylüyor değil, NASIL ikna ediyor?
SORU 3 • ARGÜMANTASYON

Argument Essay

Verilen felsefi, ahlaki veya toplumsal bir iddiayı (Örn: Sanatın sansürü, bireysel özgürlükler) kendi kanıtlarınla (Tarih, edebiyat, güncel olaylar) savunmak.

  • Kanıt Havuzu: CHORES (Current events, History, Literature...)
  • Sophistication: Karşı görüşü ele alıp nitelemek bir yoldur (zorunlu değil)

SPACE-CAT Analitik Sorgulama Modeli

Herhangi bir AP English metnini okurken ekranda not alacağın 8 kritik köşe taşı:

S - Speaker (Konuşmacı/Yazar)

Yazar kimdir, hangi kimlikle konuşuyor ve güvenilirliği (Ethos) nereden geliyor?

P - Purpose (Amaç)

Yazar dinleyiciden ne yapmasını, düşünmesini veya hissetmesini istiyor?

A - Audience (Hedef Kitle)

Hitap edilen grup kimdir, onların değerleri, ön yargıları ve hassasiyetleri nelerdir?

C - Context (Bağlam)

Metin hangi zaman, yer ve tartışma ortamında üretildi? Hangi tarihî veya toplumsal koşullar söylenenleri biçimlendiriyor?

E - Exigence (Tetikleyici Olay)

Bu metnin tam o anda yazılmasına yol açan sorun, kriz veya olay nedir?

C - Choices (Retorik Seçimler)

Yazar hangi diction, syntax, karşılaştırma, örnek ve yapı seçimlerini yapıyor? Her seçimin amaca hizmet eden işlevi nedir?

A - Appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos)

Seçimler izleyicinin güvenine, duygularına veya mantığına nasıl hitap ediyor? (Yazar "pathos kullanmaz"; duygulara hitap eder.)

T - Tone (Ton)

Yazarın konuya ve izleyiciye karşı tavrı nedir ve metin boyunca nasıl değişiyor? (Tek kelime yerine "measured yet urgent" gibi nitelikli ifade.)

Advanced Rhetorical Theory, Textual Architecture & Academic Composition

Classical rhetorical foundations, argumentation frameworks, syntactic strategies, and academic writing mechanics required for College Board 6/6 essay rubrics, IELTS 8.5+, and international engineering research:

Module 1: Classical Rhetoric & The Rhetorical Situation (SPACE-CAT Deep-Dive) Unit 1 & 2 • Classical Theory

The Aristotelian Triad & Kairos: Persuasion is not accidental; it is a calculated orchestration of three classical appeals within an opportunistic moment (Kairos):
• Ethos (Credibility & Moral Authority): Derived either from extrinsic reputation (extrinsic ethos) or internal textual virtue, goodwill, and phronesis (intrinsic ethos).
• Pathos (Affective Resonance): Stirring specific emotions (shame, indignance, hope, fear) to make the audience receptive to the thesis.
• Logos (Rational Proof): Syllogisms, enthymemes, empirical evidence, and unassailable causal reasoning.

The Exigence: The urgent spark, crisis, or imperfection marked by urgency that compels the speaker to produce discourse right now. In any rhetorical analysis, identifying the exigence unlocks the author's primary psychological target.
The Cardinal Rule of Rhetorical Analysis: Never write "The author uses ethos/pathos/logos to persuade the reader"! Ethos, pathos, and logos are NOT tools that an author "uses"; they are psychological states that an author appeals to. Write instead: "The author appeals to the audience's shared sense of moral obligation by juxtaposing...".
Module 2: Micro & Macro Syntactic Choices, Figurative Taxonomy & Tone Unit 3 & 4 • Style & Architecture

Syntactic Manipulation: Authors structure sentences deliberately to modulate intellectual pacing:
• Periodic Sentence: Withholds the main independent clause until the very end, building suspense and culminating in emphatic weight.
• Cumulative (Loose) Sentence: Begins with the main clause and accumulates subordinate details, simulating natural observation or relentless overwhelm.
• Antithesis & Chiasmus: Antithesis juxtaposes contrasting ideas in parallel structure; chiasmus reverses the order of key terms in a second clause (A–B / B–A). Both create balance and a sense of inevitability.

Tone Shifts: Persuasive texts rarely maintain a static tone. A master rhetorician might begin with a clinical, detached analytical tone, transition to indignant moral outrage, and conclude with an urgent, inspiring call to action. Tracing these tonal shifts across the beginning, middle, and end is critical for high-scoring commentary.
Module 3: The 6-Point Analytic Essay Architecture & Line of Reasoning FRQ Mastery • 1-4-1 Rubric

Engineering a Defensible Thesis (Row A - 1 Point): Must establish a defensible claim analyzing the author's specific rhetorical choices and their programmatic purpose:
"Although [Acknowledge Counter-Perspective], by [Rhetorical Strategy 1] and [Rhetorical Strategy 2], [Author] [Active Verb] [Audience] to [Core Purpose]."

Evidence & Commentary (Row B - 0 to 4 Points): Specific evidence must be followed by commentary that explains how it supports a clear line of reasoning. Body paragraphs must not be isolated islands. Each paragraph must link to the preceding paragraph through transitional logic (e.g., chronological unfolding of the speech, escalation from individual guilt to collective civic duty).
Sophistication (Row C - 1 Point): Achieved by situating the text within its broader historical, political, or philosophical context, exploring the complexities/tensions within the argument, or employing a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive.
Module 4: Academic Writing for International Engineering & Research European Standard • IELTS 8.5+

Scientific & Technical Synthesis: In your future degree at PoliMi or TU Munich, writing lab reports, technical abstracts, and research papers demands:
1. Objective Register: Avoiding personal pronouns ("I", "you") in favor of passive or agent-focused constructions ("The empirical data indicates...", "The experiment was calibrated to...").
2. Hedging Language: Using academic qualifiers ("strongly suggests", "tends to correlate", "substantiates") rather than naive absolutes ("proves 100%").
3. Cohesive Ties: Utilizing logical transition markers (Consequently, Furthermore, In stark contrast, Conversely, Concomitantly) to weave disparate technical findings into a unified engineering proposal.

Adım Adım Çözümlü AP FRQ

AP tarzı özgün soru; puanlama ölçütleriyle adım adım çözüm.

MODEL 1: COLLEGE BOARD AP CENTRAL FRQ TARZI (Q2 RHETORICAL ANALYSIS) Puan Değeri: 6 Puanlık Analitik Rubrik (1-4-1)

PROMPT: Aşağıdaki metin, National Consumers League genel sekreteri ve sosyal reformcu Florence Kelley'nin 1905'te Philadelphia'da National American Woman Suffrage Association kongresinde yaptığı konuşmadan alınmıştır (1905 tarihli konuşma, kamu malı).
"Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy."
Görev: Florence Kelley'nin dinleyicilerini çocuk işçiliği yasalarının acilen değiştirilmesi gerektiğine ikna etmek için hangi retorik stratejileri (rhetorical choices) kullandığını analiz eden savunulabilir bir makale yazınız.

College Board 6 Puanlık Rubrik ve Kusursuz Çözüm Mimarisi:
• Satır A - Tez (Thesis) [1 Puan]:
Kural: Sadece metni tekrar etme ("Kelley uses pathos and repetition to persuade"). Yazarın ne yaptığını ve hangi amaca hizmet ettiğini belirt.
Model Tez: "By juxtaposing the comfortable complacency of adult consumers with the grueling nocturnal labor of young girls, and invoking a shared sense of moral complicity through collective pronouns, Florence Kelley dismantles industrial rationalizations to compel privileged citizens to mobilize for legislative child labor reforms." (1/1 Puan Alır).
• Satır B - Kanıt ve Yorum (Evidence & Commentary) [4 Puan]:
- 1. Gövde Paragrafı (Juxtaposition & Pathos): Kelley zıtlığı kurar ("while we sleep" vs. "little girls working through the night"). Buradaki amaç suçluluk duygusu yaratmaktır. Alıntı gömülmeli ve yazarın zihnindeki mekanizma açıklanmalıdır.
- 2. Gövde Paragrafı (Moral Complicity): "for us to buy" ifadesi cümleyi dinleyicinin kendisiyle bitirir; satın alınan kumaş ile çocukların gece emeği arasında doğrudan bir bağ kurarak dinleyiciyi dolaylı sorumlu konumuna yerleştirir.
- Puanlama Kriteri: Alıntıların arkasından en az 2-3 cümle "Bu seçim dinleyicinin zihninde nasıl bir psikolojik dönüşüm yaratıyor?" sorusunun yanıtı verilmelidir (4/4 Puan).
• Satır C - Sofistike Derinlik (Sophistication) [1 Puan]:
Konuşmanın oy hakkı için mücadele eden bir kitleye yapıldığını ve Kelley'nin çocuk işçiliği reformunu kadınların oy hakkı talebiyle ilişkilendirdiğini bağlama yerleştirerek açıklamak, sofistike puanı için güçlü bir yoldur (1/1 Puan). Toplam: 6/6 Tam Puan.
3 ÖZGÜN PROMPT • 6 PUANLIK RUBRİK

FRQ Yazım İstasyonu: Rubrik Tabanlı Öz Değerlendirme

Üç FRQ türünün her biri için BilgeAP için yazılmış bir AP-style prompt. Metnini kutuya yaz, kelime sayacını ve isteğe bağlı süre sayacını kullan, sonra rubriğin üç satırını kendi metnine dürüstçe uygula. Prompt ve kaynakların tamamı özgün ve kurgusaldır (alıntı değildir); kişi ve kurum adları uydurmadır.

Resmî zamanlama ve rubrik (doğrulandı, AP Central 2025): Section II toplam 2 saat 15 dakikadır ve 15 dakikalık okuma süresini içerir. Önerilen dağılım: Synthesis için yaklaşık 15 dk okuma/planlama + 40 dk yazma; Rhetorical Analysis ve Argument için yaklaşık 40'ar dk yazma. Her essay 6 puandır: Row A Thesis 0–1, Row B Evidence & Commentary 0–4, Row C Sophistication 0–1. Aşağıdaki satır açıklamaları resmî metnin kendi sözlerimizle yazılmış özetidir. 2025 FRQ Set 1 (zamanlama) 2025 Scoring Guidelines Set 1 (rubrik)
PROMPT • AP-style original (Q1 Synthesis)

Across Europe and North America, lawmakers are debating so-called right-to-repair rules, which would require manufacturers to sell spare parts, publish repair manuals, and make diagnostic tools available to consumers and independent repair shops. Supporters see repair as a matter of cost and sustainability; opponents raise concerns about safety, security, and product design.

Carefully read the following five sources, including the introductory information for each source. Write an essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on the extent to which manufacturers should be required to make their products repairable by consumers and independent shops.

Cite sources as Source A, Source B, and so on. In your response you should respond to the prompt with a thesis that presents a defensible position; select and use evidence from at least three sources to support your line of reasoning; explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning; and use appropriate grammar and punctuation.

Sources A–E (original, fictional — written for this studio)
Source A — Feature article by a consumer journalistFictional • Original

At the monthly repair café in the town library, volunteers keep a notebook of every object that arrives. Most share a pattern: one small part has failed while everything else still works. A kettle with a cracked switch. A laptop whose only fault is a worn-out battery glued to the case. "People think they are bringing us broken machines," one volunteer told me. "Usually they are bringing us a missing screw, a missing part, or a missing manual."

Source B — Table from a household survey (invented data)Fictional • Original

Results of an imaginary survey of 1,200 households, created for practice. The figures are not real statistics.

FaultTypical repair costTypical replacement costHouseholds that chose repair
Phone screen cracked€95€42031%
Laptop battery worn out€80€90022%
Washing-machine pump failed€60€45048%

Most common reason given for not repairing: "I could not find the part or anyone able to fit it."

Source C — Statement from a manufacturers' associationFictional • Original

Our members support longer product lives. However, modern devices contain high-energy batteries, pressurised components, and security chips that protect users' personal data. An untrained repair can start a fire or leave a device open to attack. Authorised repair networks exist precisely so that the person opening a device knows what is inside it. Mandating open access to every tool and part would shift risk onto consumers who never asked to carry it.

Source D — Essay by an engineering professorFictional • Original

Repairability is not a sticker added at the end of a project; it is a decision made at the drawing board. A product held together with screws and standard connectors can be opened in minutes; one sealed with adhesive cannot. Yet every design choice is a trade-off. Glue can make a phone thinner and more water-resistant. The honest question is not whether repair is good, but which trade-offs we are willing to accept, and who should be allowed to decide.

Source E — Policy brief from a city environment officeFictional • Original

Discarded electronics are among the fastest-growing categories of waste our collection service handles, and they are among the most expensive to process safely. Extending the life of a device by even two years reduces both the waste stream and the demand for new raw materials. The office recommends that the city purchase only equipment for which spare parts are guaranteed to remain available for at least seven years.

0 kelime • Atıf yapılan kaynaklar: — • Henüz kaydedilmedi.

Kalan süre 55:00 Hazır

Öz değerlendirme: rubrik kontrol listesi

Thesis models by level and commentary tips
Weak (Row A: 0): "There are many different opinions about whether products should be easier to repair." Restates the topic and takes no position.
Developing (Row A: 1): "Manufacturers should be required to make their products repairable because repair saves money and reduces waste." Defensible, but two parallel reasons with no tension; it invites a list-like essay.
Strong (Row A: 1, sets up Row C): "Manufacturers should be required to guarantee spare parts and repair manuals for a fixed period, because repairability is a design obligation rather than a consumer's burden; the genuine safety risks raised in Source C argue for certifying independent repairers, not for keeping repair locked away." Takes a qualified position and already engages a tension across sources.
Commentary: moving up Row BSynthesis

Summary (1–2): "Source B shows that a phone screen repair costs €95 while a new phone costs €420."

Commentary (3–4): "The gap in Source B matters less than the reason households give for ignoring it: the missing part, not the price, defeats repair. A law that guarantees parts therefore targets the actual obstacle, which is why it would change behaviour where a discount alone would not."

Tips: open each paragraph with a claim that advances your thesis, not with a source; use at least three sources but let your reasoning, not the sources, set the order; after each piece of evidence, explain how and why it supports the claim; put two sources in conversation ("Source D complicates Source E by...").

Yazdığın metin ve öz puanın hesabına kaydedilir. AP okuyucuları kelime sayısına puan vermez; sayaç yalnızca kendi tempo takibin içindir.
6 ÖZGÜN PASAJ

Unit A: Rhetorical Analysis & Reading MCQ — İnteraktif Soru İstasyonu

Özgün AP tarzı sorular (geçmiş sınav sorusu değil). Şık seç; anında çözüm ve hata türü gelir.

Passage 1 — A branch librarian addresses a city councilSpeech • Original

(1) Members of the council, I have worked at the Eastside branch for nineteen years, and I have never once asked this body for anything. (2) I am asking now. (3) The proposal before you would close our doors at five o'clock instead of nine. (4) On paper, that saves four hours a day. (5) In our reading room, it erases the only hours when a night-shift nurse can help her son with algebra, when a man who drives a delivery van can finish the résumé he cannot type on his phone, when a girl whose apartment has no quiet corner can study for her exams. (6) You will hear that these patrons can simply come earlier. (7) They cannot; that is precisely why they come late. (8) I do not doubt that the budget is tight. (9) I ask only that, before you balance it, you count the people who will pay for the savings.

Passage 2 — From an essay on navigating a cityEssay • Original

(1) My grandfather navigated Istanbul by landmarks: the bakery with the green awning, the mosque whose minaret leaned slightly toward the sea, the corner where the tram bell always rang twice. (2) I navigate it by a blue dot. (3) The dot is never wrong, and that is exactly the problem. (4) Because it never fails, I never have to notice anything; because I never notice anything, the city has become, for me, a series of instructions rather than a place. (5) I am not proposing that we throw away our phones. (6) Maps on screens have saved me from more wrong turns than I can count. (7) But a tool that removes every chance of getting lost also removes the chance of finding what we were not looking for.

Passage 3 — From an address on communication in engineeringAddress • Original

(1) In 1999, NASA lost the Mars Climate Orbiter because one team's software reported thruster data in imperial units while another team's software expected metric units. (2) The mathematics on both sides was sound; what failed was the agreement about what the numbers meant. (3) The failure lived in the space between the teams. (4) Engineering students often imagine that the hard part of their future work will be the mathematics. (5) It will not be. (6) The hard part will be making sure that what you mean is what your colleague understands—across departments, across languages, across time zones. (7) Learn your equations, by all means. (8) Then learn to write a sentence that cannot be misread.

Passage 4 — From an essay on reading and leisure (original, written in a nineteenth-century style)Essay • Original • 19th-century style

(1) It is a common complaint of our age that men have no leisure; yet I suspect the truer complaint would be that they have leisure enough, and know not what to do with it. (2) The merchant who rises before the lamplighter has finished his rounds will tell you that he has not an hour to call his own; but follow him of an evening, and you shall find him turning the pages of three newspapers, each of which informs him of the same fire, the same election, and the same misfortune at sea. (3) He is not idle, he will protest; he is keeping himself acquainted with the world. (4) I do not quarrel with the newspaper. (5) It is a useful servant, and a nation that could not read of its own affairs would soon cease to have any affairs worth reading of. (6) But a servant who is suffered to sit at the head of the table will in time forget that he is a servant. (7) The mind, like the stomach, is not nourished by the quantity it receives but by the portion it digests; and he who swallows the whole of the day's intelligence before breakfast may find himself, by supper, as hungry and as ignorant as he began. (8) Consider the farmer of my boyhood, who owned four books and had read each of them, I believe, a dozen times. (9) He could not have told you the price of cotton in Liverpool, but he could reason upon any question you put to him with a steadiness that would have shamed a parliament. (10) His knowledge was narrow, but it was his own; ours is broad, and it belongs to the printer. (11) I would not have my reader burn his papers, nor retire to a hillside with four volumes and a cow. (12) I would only ask him, before he takes up the next sheet, to put to himself a plain question: what will I know when I have finished it that I shall still know at the end of the week? (13) If the answer be nothing, let him lay it down, and take a walk, or take up a book that has survived its author; for the hours he saves will be the only leisure he has ever truly possessed.

Passage 5 — From remarks delivered at a public meetingSpeech • Original

(1) Last July, on the hottest afternoon of the year, two thermometers sat four kilometers apart in our city. (2) The one on Değirmen Street, beneath a row of sixty-year-old plane trees, read 31 degrees Celsius. (3) The one in the parking lot behind the new shopping center, where the trees had been removed to make room for 400 additional spaces, read 39. (4) Eight degrees is not a statistic; it is the difference between an afternoon an elderly person can survive at home and one she cannot. (5) Researchers have measured this effect in cities around the world, and the pattern is consistent: on the hottest days, neighborhoods with dense tree cover are several degrees cooler than neighborhoods without it. (6) In our own city, the municipal health office reported that of the 23 heat-related hospital admissions last summer, 17 came from the three districts with the least tree cover. (7) Critics of the proposed planting program raise two objections, and both deserve an answer. (8) The first is cost: the program would spend roughly 14 million lira over five years. (9) That is a real sum. (10) But it is less than the city spent last year repaving roads that buckled in the heat—roads that, under shade, would have lasted longer. (11) The second objection is time: a sapling planted today will not shade anyone for a decade. (12) This is true, and it is precisely the reason to begin now. (13) The plane trees on Değirmen Street were not planted by people who expected to sit beneath them. (14) They were planted by people who understood that a city is not the possession of a single generation but a loan held in trust for the next. (15) The council will vote on the planting program next month. (16) I ask each member to stand, before that vote, for ten minutes in each of those two places, and then decide.

Passage 6 — From a personal essayEssay • Original

(1) My father kept a drawer he called "the hospital." (2) Into it went the radio with the loose dial, the lamp that flickered, the toaster that browned only one side of the bread. (3) On Sunday afternoons he would open the drawer, choose a patient, and spread its parts across the kitchen table on a sheet of newspaper. (4) Not every patient survived. (5) But I learned, watching him, that a machine is not a sealed mystery; it is a set of decisions someone made, and decisions can be understood. (6) That lesson is harder to learn today, and not because children are less curious. (7) Many of the devices we own are glued rather than screwed together; their batteries cannot be replaced without special tools; their manuals, if they exist at all, advise the owner to "contact an authorized service provider." (8) Manufacturers defend these designs, and some of their reasons are sound: a sealed phone resists water, and a thinner case is lighter in the hand. (9) Yet a design that keeps water out can also keep the owner out, and the second effect is rarely advertised. (10) The cost is not only the price of a new device when the old one could have been mended. (11) It is the slow disappearance of a habit of mind—the expectation that when something breaks, one might look inside and find out why. (12) A society that loses that expectation does not merely throw away more toasters. (13) It becomes a society that accepts, a little more readily each year, that the workings of things are someone else's business. (14) I am not nostalgic for the flickering lamp. (15) I am nostalgic for the Sunday afternoon, for the newspaper spread across the table, and for the quiet assumption, which my father never thought to put into words, that understanding was something an ordinary person was allowed to attempt.

24 SORU • 6 ÖĞRENCİ TASLAĞI

Unit B: Writing MCQ (Revision & Composition) — İnteraktif Soru İstasyonu

Özgün AP tarzı sorular (geçmiş sınav sorusu değil). Şık seç; anında çözüm ve hata türü gelir.

Draft 1 — Student proposal: water refill stationsProposal • Draft

(1) Every day, the vending machines in our cafeteria sell bottled water to students who could drink it for free. (2) Last month, the student council counted the empty bottles in the recycling bins near the cafeteria: about 1,400 in a single week. (3) Refill stations, which filter tap water and display how many bottles they have saved, cost less than many people assume. (4) A nearby school installed two stations last year. (5) Its weekly bottle count fell by more than half within one semester. (6) Our school should get refill stations. (7) Some students worry that tap water tastes worse, but the stations filter the water before it reaches the spout.

Draft 2 — Student research paragraph: urban treesResearch • Draft

(1) On a summer afternoon, an asphalt parking lot can be far hotter than a shaded park only a few streets away. (2) Multiplied across a whole city, such hot surfaces produce what scientists call the urban heat island effect: cities stay warmer than the countryside around them. (3) Trees reduce this effect in two ways: their canopies block sunlight before it reaches the pavement, and they release water vapor that cools the surrounding air. (4) I personally love trees because they are beautiful. (5) Cities that have expanded their tree cover have reported lower surface temperatures in newly planted neighborhoods. (6) Planting trees, therefore, is not merely decoration; it is public-health infrastructure.

Draft 3 — Student email to a university admissions officeEmail • Draft

(1) Hey! (2) I'm a high school student in Istanbul and I'm super interested in your Mechanical Engineering program. (3) I have completed AP Calculus AB, and I am currently studying AP Physics C: Mechanics. (4) I would like to know whether AP scores can be used to meet any of the program's admission requirements. (5) Thanks a lot!!

Draft 4 — Student argument: bike lanes on Elm AvenueArgument • Draft

(1) Some shop owners on Elm Avenue argue that the proposed bike lanes will hurt their businesses by removing parking spaces. (2) This concern deserves a serious answer. (3) Bike lanes always increase sales for every shop on the street. (4) Cyclists tend to spend less per visit than drivers. (5) They visit more often, so their total monthly spending can be similar or higher. (6) The city council will vote in March. (7) The vote will decide whether the lanes are built.

Draft 5 — Student essay for the school science magazine: a repair clubEssay • Draft

(1) Every June, the hallway outside the physics lab fills with abandoned equipment: calculators with cracked screens, headphones missing one ear, a desk lamp that flickers like a nervous candle. (2) Most of these objects are not broken beyond saving. (3) They are broken beyond our patience. (4) A repair club, meeting once a week in the lab, would teach students to diagnose faults, to solder loose connections, and replacing worn batteries safely. (5) The club would also save the school money, the equipment budget has been cut twice in three years. (6) Our teachers have offered to supervise. (7) What we need now is a room, a toolbox, and a willingness to look at a broken thing and ask how it works.

Draft 6 — Student lab-report abstract: the speed of soundLab Report • Draft

(1) In our experiment, we measured the speed of sound in air using a resonance tube partly filled with water. (2) By raising and lowering the water level, the first two resonance positions were located for a 512 Hz tuning fork. (3) The distance between these positions equals half a wavelength, so the wavelength was 0.67 m. (4) Multiplying the wavelength by the frequency gave a speed of 343 m/s, which is real close to the accepted value at room temperature. (5) Our result has a small uncertainty. (6) The largest source of error was judging by ear exactly where the sound was loudest. (7) Future groups could reduce this error by using a microphone connected to a data logger.